мȸ ǥ ʷ

ǥ : ȣ - 540341   109 
The Effect of Oral Beraprost Sodium, a Prostaglandin I(2) Analogue, on Microvascular Dysfunction in High-Risk Diabetic Patients : A Double-blind, Randomized, Controlled Trial : the Result of Interim Analysis.
연세대학교 의과대학 심장내과¹ , 연세대학교 의과대학 내분비내과²
신상훈¹, 장혁재¹ , 한호진¹ , 김광준² , 문제훈² , 차봉수² , 양우인¹ , 최동훈¹
BACKGROUND: Beraprost sodium (BPS) is a new stable, orally active prostaglandin I2 analogue with antiplatelet and vasodilating properties. It has been widely used for the treatment of pulmonary hypertension and atherosclerotic peripheral arterial disease (PAD), but its efficacy in peripheral microvascular dysfunction has not been established. We designed a placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized trial of BPS in patients with symptom of microvascular dysfunction in high-risk diabetic patients, and report the results of the interim analysis. METHODS: In this placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized trial (conducted from Oct 2009 to May 2010), 46 patients (male 33%, 60 ± 6 years) with symptoms of microvascular dysfunction but without evidence of PAD were randomized to receive BPS (40 microgram, tid) or placebo for 8 weeks. Blood was sampled for routine chemistry at baseline and at 8 weeks. All patients underwent temperature rebound (TR) and nadir to peak (NP) as an objective index of vascular reactivity using digital thermal monitoring device (Vendys, Endothelix Inc., Houston). Intensity and frequency of symptoms – pain, burning sensation, paresthesia and numbness - were recorded as a subjective index at inclusion and at the end of the study. The primary end point was the improvement of total symptom score (TSS), TR and NP above baseline. RESULTS: At 8 weeks of treatment, the change of TR, NP and TSS did not reach statistical significance of differences between BPS and placebo (TR: 0.13 ± 0.63 vs. 0.22 ± 0.67 °C, p=0.62; NP: 0.57 ± 0.80 vs. 0.59 ± 0.60 °C, p=0.90; TSS: 2.43 ± 2.23 vs. 3.24 ± 2.70 points, p=0.29). The number of patients who showed an improvement of TR (8 vs. 11, p=0.226), NP (14 vs. 21, p=0.170), and TSS (16 vs. 21, p=0.506) was also similar between BPS and placebo. CONCLUSION: The BPS did not reach statistically significance in both subjective symptoms and objective parameters. The beneficial effects of beraprost on symptomatic microvascular dysfunction in high-risk diabetic patients should be confirmed in long-term large clinical trials.


[ư]


logo 학술대회일정 사전등록안내 초록등록안내 초록등록/관리 숙박 및 교통 안내 전시 및 광고