мȸ ǥ ʷ

ǥ : ȣ - 530289   322 
Diagnostic Uncertainty of 12-lead ECG for Diagnosing Posterior Wall Myocardial Infarction
대한심장학회 Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry 연구자
김성수, 정명호, 안영근, 채성철, 허승호, 성인환, 김종현, 홍택종, 구본권, 채제건, 채동훈, 윤정한, 배장호, 나승운, 류제영, 김두일, 김기식, 김병옥, 오석규, 채인호, 이명용, 정경태, 조명찬, 김종진, 김영조, 외 Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry Investigators
Background: Prompt restoration of blood flow in the infarct-related artery is essential to myocardial salvage and mortality reduction in patients with total occluded coronary artery. As the benefits of reperfusion decline rapidly with time, initial diagnostic tool is very important. In Korea, 12-lead surface electrocardiogram (ECG) is a routine diagnostic tool to detect acute myocardial infarction (AMI). However, 12 lead ECG was not suitable for diagnosing posterior wall myocardial infarction (MI) associated with left circumflex artery (LCX). This study was designed to diagnostic uncertainty of 12 lead ECG for diagnosing posterior wall MI. Methods: Total 2,281 patients (1,683 males, 59.7±13.3 year-old) showing total occlusion (pre-TIMI flow: 0) in single, de novo native coronary arteries on angiography were enrolled from Nov 2005 to Jan 2008 in KAMIR. These patients were divided into the three groups according to coronary artery (Left anterior descending artery (LAD), Right coronary artery (RCA), LCX. Results: There was no significant difference in clinical characteristics. But, in 12 lead ECG, V1-V4 ST elevation was frequently associated with LAD group (78.9% vs 6.0 vs 5.0%, p<0.001), II III aVF ST elevation : RCA group (75.8% vs 5.8% vs 26.8%, p<0.001), I aVL, V5-V6 ST elevation : LCX group (18.4% vs 10.5% vs 3.9%, p<0.001). However, in initial diagnosis, ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) was frequently diagnosed in LAD, RCA group by 12 lead ECG compared with LCX group (87.0% vs. 82.3% vs. 46.3%, p<0.001). Subsequently, the rate of primary PCI was higher in LAD, RCA group (78.9% vs. 74.5% vs. 43.4%, p<0.001). Door to balloon time lesser than 90 minutes was more associated with LAD and RCA group compared with LCX (52.8% vs 51.0% vs 31.3%, p<0.001). Conclusions: 12 lead ECG is not effective diagnostic tool for detect LCX total occlusion. If STEMI in LCX territory was suspected clinically, other method such as 18-lead ECG should be considered.

 

LAD (n=1,162)

RCA (n=799)

LCX (n=320)

P value

ST elevation in V1-V4

917(78.9%)

48(6.0%)

16(5.0%)

<0.001

II III aVF

67(5.8%)

606(75.8%)

86(26.8%)

<0.001

I aVL V5-V6

123(10.5%)

31(3.9%)

59(18.4%)

<0.001

Initial diagnosis-STEMI

1011(87.0%)

658(82.3%)

148(46.3%)

<0.001

Primary PCI

917(78.9%)

595(74.5%)

139(43.4%)

<0.001

Door to balloon time

 

 

 

 

<90min

614(52.8%)

408(51.0%)

100(31.3%)

<0.001

<180min

764(65.7%)

499(62.5%)

155(48.4%)

<0.001

 


[ư]


logo 학술대회일정 사전등록안내 초록등록안내 초록등록/관리 숙박 및 교통 안내 전시안내