ǥ :
|
ȣ - 520825 143 |
Impact of Diabetes versus Non-diabetes on Severity of Acetylcholine-induced Coronary Arterial Endothelial Dysfunction |
고려대학교 구로병원 순환기내과 |
나승운, 김지훈, Zhe Jin, Kang-Yin Chen, Yoshiyasu Minami, Yong-Jian Li, Kanhaiya L. Poddar, 박재형, 나진오, 최철웅, 임홍의, 김진원, 김응주, 박창규, 서홍석, 오동주 |
Background: There has been limited data regarding impact of diabetes mellitus (DM) on coronary artery endothelial dysfunction is not clarified yet. We compared the severity of acetylcholine (Ach)-induced coronary artery endothelial dysfunction between DM and non-DM patients and according to the glycemic control level.
Methods: This study consisted of 1,083 patients (pts, Male 539, Age 56.46±12.23 years) without significant coronary artery disease underwent Ach provocation test by injecting incremental doses of 20, 50 and 100 g to left coronary artery. Coronary artery endothelial dysfunction severity was defined as mild (<50%), moderate (50– 0%) or severe transient luminal narrowing (>70%) regardless of chest pain or ST-T change of EKG. Impact of presence of DM and HbA1c on the coronary endothelial dysfunction severity was analyzed.
Results: Conventional risk factors of coronary atherosclerosis were not different between the groups. DM patients did not show any difference in Ach induced mild, moderate, or severe endothelial dysfunction distribution compared to non-DM patients (Table 1). This finding was constant when insulin/OHA treated group and diet therapy group was compared (Table 2). Also, HbA1c level did not reveal any difference in distribution between any of the pre-defined endothelial dysfunction severity (Table 3).
Conclusion: DM patients did not show any difference in endothelial dysfunction distribution compared to non-DM patients.
|
Table. Endothelial dysfunction severity
Transient luminal narrowing
by QCA |
DM
(n=122) |
Non-DM
(n=961) |
p-value |
mild (< 50%)
moderate (50-70%)
severe (> 70%) |
77 (63.1%)
65 (53.0%)
27 (22.1%) |
559 (58.2%)
509 (53.5%)
276 (28.7%) |
0.172
0.513
0.076 |
HbA1c |
< 7
(n=390) |
7 - 9
(n=40) |
> 9
(n=13) |
P-value |
mild (< 50%)
moderate (50-70%)
severe (> 70%) |
247 (63.3%)
226 (57.9%)
123 (31.5%) |
25 (62.5%)
22 (55.0%)
25 (23.1%) |
9 (69.2%)
7 (53.8%)
4 (30.8%) |
0.903
0.903
0.696 |
|
|
|