ǥ :
|
ȣ - 520033 330 |
Positive remodeling is associated with more plaque vulnerability and higher frequency of plaque prolapse accompanied with post-procedural cardiac enzyme elevation compared with intermediate/negative remodeling in patients with acute myocardial infarction |
전남대학교병원 심장센터, 전남대학교 심혈관계 특성화사업단 |
홍영준, 정명호, 최윤하, 고점석, 이민구, 강원유, 이신은, 김수현, 심두선, 박근호, 윤남식, 윤현주, 김계훈, 박형욱, 김주한, 안영근, 조정관, 박종춘, 강정채, 박옥규 |
Background: Studies correlating intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and clinical findings have suggested that positive remodeling (PR) in culprit lesions is associated with acute coronary syndromes and events at post-intervention.
Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess the impact of remodeling pattern on other pre- and post-procedural IVUS findings in 310 acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients (125 ST segment elevation and 185 non-ST segment elevation MI).
Methods: PR (n=113) was defined as remodeling index (lesion/reference external elastic membrane cross-sectional area [CSA]) >1.05, intermediate remodeling (IR) as between 0.95-1.05, and negative remodeling (NR) as >0.95 (IR/NR group, n=197).
Results: The plaque rupture (60% vs. 42%, p=0.004), multiple plaque ruptures (22% vs. 14%, p=0.014), thrombus (42% vs. 28%, p=0.012), hypoechoic plaque (62% vs. 41%, p<0.001), lipid-pool like image (40% vs. 26%, p=0.011), and scattered calcification (62% vs. 41%, p<0.001) were more common in PR group compared with IR/NR group. IVUS lesion length was longer (26±16 mm vs. 22±12 mm, p=0.026), lesion site plaque burden was greater (82±36% vs. 76±30%, p=0.014), and arc of calcium was smaller (97±106º vs. 150±106º, p<0.001) in PR group compared with IR/NR group. Plaque cavity was significantly larger (2.8±1.8 mm2 vs. 2.2±1.4 mm2, p=0.016) and ruptured plaque length was significantly longer (3.2±1.7 mm vs. 2.4±1.2 mm, p=0.011) in PR group compared with IR/NR group. Post-stenting plaque prolapse was observed more frequently (36% vs. 22%, p=0.008), and cardiac enzyme was elevated more significantly after stenting in PR group compared with IR/NR group [CK-MB; +15.3±22.1 U/l vs. +5.6±11.1 U/l, p=0.022, and cTnI; +10.4±15.6 ng/ml vs. +5.5±9.4 ng/ml, p=0.008, respectively].
Conclusions: AMI patients with PR have more plaque vulnerability and higher frequency of plaque prolapse accompanied with post-procedural cardiac enzyme elevation compared with AMI patients with IR/NR
|
|
|
|