회원로그인

мȸ ǥ ʷ

ǥ : ȣ - 470068   30 
Influence of Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Stenting on 6-Month Angiographic and Clinical Results in Patients with Angina
Cardiovascular Medicine, Keimyung University College of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
Seung-Ho Hur, Kwon-Bae Kim, Hyuck-Jun Yoon, Young-Soo Lee, Dae-Woo Hyun, Seong-Wook Han, Kee-Sik Kim, Yoon-Nyun Kim
Background: Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-gudied stenting have contributed to new concept of stent implantation in clinical practice. Several studies have shown that IVUS-guided stenting improved an angiographic restenosis as well as clinical outcomes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of IVUS-guided stenting on 6-month angiographic restenosis rate and clinical outcomes compared with angiographically guided stenting. Methods: We analyzed 115 selected patients with 134 stents who underwent IVUS-guided or angiographically guided stent implantation. Standard clinical, angiographic, and IVUS parameters collected. The primary endpoint was a binary restenosis at 6-month follow-up angiography. The combined secondary endpoint was major adverse cardiac events (included death, non-fatal myocardial infarction; MACE) and target vessel revascularization (TVR) at 6-month follow-up. Results: See below. Conclusion: The IVUS-guided group showed a larger post-stent MLD and a larger stent size. There was no difference in the rate of MACE and TVR at 6-month follow-up between the two groups. Although statistical significance was not achieved, IVUS-guided stenting seems to decrease the restenosis rate at 6-month follow-up angiography.

 

IVUS-guided

 Angio-guided

Patients / Stents

27/30

88/104

Reference VD(mm)

3.31±0.53

3.10±0.46

Lesion Length(mm)

17.2±7.9

15.45±6.97

Lesion MLD(mm)

0.60±0.3

0.51±0.23

Post-Stent MLD(mm)

3.38±0.4

 3.05±0.45*

FU MLD(mm)

2.17±0.9

1.85±0.87

Stent Size(mm)

3.46±0.4

3.18±0.44*

QCA-Restenosis@6- Month (%)

23.3

31.7

MACE @ 6-Month (%)

3.7

3.4

TVR @ 6-Month (%)

23.3

24.0

* p <0.05



[ư]