ǥ :
|
ȣ - 470068 30 |
Influence of Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Stenting on 6-Month Angiographic and Clinical Results in Patients with Angina
|
Cardiovascular Medicine, Keimyung University College of Medicine, Daegu, Korea |
Seung-Ho Hur, Kwon-Bae Kim, Hyuck-Jun Yoon, Young-Soo Lee, Dae-Woo Hyun, Seong-Wook Han, Kee-Sik Kim, Yoon-Nyun Kim |
Background: Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-gudied stenting have contributed to new concept of stent implantation in clinical practice. Several studies have shown that IVUS-guided stenting improved an angiographic restenosis as well as clinical outcomes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of IVUS-guided stenting on 6-month angiographic restenosis rate and clinical outcomes compared with angiographically guided stenting.
Methods: We analyzed 115 selected patients with 134 stents who underwent IVUS-guided or angiographically guided stent implantation. Standard clinical, angiographic, and IVUS parameters collected. The primary endpoint was a binary restenosis at 6-month follow-up angiography. The combined secondary endpoint was major adverse cardiac events (included death, non-fatal myocardial infarction; MACE) and target vessel revascularization (TVR) at 6-month follow-up. Results: See below.
Conclusion: The IVUS-guided group showed a larger post-stent MLD and a larger stent size. There was no difference in the rate of MACE and TVR at 6-month follow-up between the two groups. Although statistical significance was not achieved, IVUS-guided stenting seems to decrease the restenosis rate at 6-month follow-up angiography.
|
|
IVUS-guided |
Angio-guided |
Patients / Stents |
27/30 |
88/104 |
Reference VD(mm) |
3.31±0.53 |
3.10±0.46 |
Lesion Length(mm) |
17.2±7.9 |
15.45±6.97 |
Lesion MLD(mm) |
0.60±0.3 |
0.51±0.23 |
Post-Stent MLD(mm) |
3.38±0.4 |
3.05±0.45* |
FU MLD(mm) |
2.17±0.9 |
1.85±0.87 |
Stent Size(mm) |
3.46±0.4 |
3.18±0.44* |
QCA-Restenosis@6- Month (%) |
23.3 |
31.7 |
MACE @ 6-Month (%) |
3.7 |
3.4 |
TVR @ 6-Month (%) |
23.3 |
24.0 |
* p
<0.05
|
|
|