мȸ ǥ ʷ


Warning: getimagesize(/home/virtual/circulationadmin/renewal/econgress/conference/abstract/img_files/KOMER초록그림.jpg) [function.getimagesize]: failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/virtual/circulationadmin/new/econgress/conference/manage/schedule/view_abstract.php on line 164
ǥ : ȣ - 530285   166 
Zotarolimus-eluting stent are not different to first generation drug-eluting stents in terms of clinical efficacy and safety during two years follow-up after Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in ST-Elevation Acute Myocardial Infarction
가천의대 길병원심장내과¹ , 고려대학교 구로병원순환기내과² , 전남대학교병원 순환기내과³ , 건양대학교병원 순환기내과⁴, 계명대학교 동산의료원심장내과5 , 영남대학교 의료원순환기내과6 , 원광대학교병원 순환기내과7 , 인제대학교 백병원8 , 연세대학교 연세의료원9 , 연세대학교 원주기독병원10
이경훈, 안태훈¹ , 강웅철¹ , 라승운² , 안영근³ , 정명호³ , 배장호⁴ , 허승호5 , 박종선6 , 오석규7 , 김두일8 , 김병옥8 , 장양수9 , 윤정한10
Background: There were no published data regarding the long-term clinical efficacy and safety of second generation drug-eluting stent (zotarolimus-eluting stents, ZES) following primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Methods: This study was aimed to establish the clinical outcomes of PCI with ZES compared to first generation DES (sirolimus-eluting stent, SES and paclitaxel-eluting stent, PES) for primary PCI in STEMI. A prospective, open-labeled, randomized multi-center trial has been performed at 11 centers in Korea. All patients will be clinically followed-up for two years. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac event (MACE): the composite of cardiac death (CD), recurrent MI and ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization (TLR)) at two years. Stent thromboses (ST) by ARC definition were analyzed. Results: Total 485 patients (ZES=164, SES=160, PES=160) who were completed more than two year were analyzed. Two-year MACE were 6.1%, 2.5% and 4.4% in ZES-, SES- and PES-group, respectively (p=0.278). ST was two (1.2%), four (2.5%) and three (1.9%) in ZES-, SES- and PES- group, respectively (p=0.7). Nine month angiographic follow up was completed in 50.3%. Late loss was 0.65 ± 0.64 mm, 0.12 ± 0.39 mm and 0.35 ± 0.58 mm in ZES-, SES- and PES- group (p<0.001). Predictors of MACE were old age (>75 years), diabetes, late loss and baseline heart rate at the time of enrollment but not affected by stent differences. Conclusions: Campared to SES and PES, ZES were not different in terms of MACE and ST through two-year clinical follow-up in patients following primary PCI.
̹ 󼼺


[ư]


logo 학술대회일정 사전등록안내 초록등록안내 초록등록/관리 숙박 및 교통 안내 전시안내