мȸ ǥ ʷ

ǥ : ȣ - 520412   163 
Clinical, Electrophysiological, and Biochemical Predictors for New Onset Atrial Fibrillation in Patients With Pacemaker
고려대학교 안암병원 심혈관센터
고경정, , 박희남, 김숙경, 장진근, 박재형, 이현수, 박재석, 곽재진, 김용현, 최종일, 임홍의, 김영훈
Background It has been known that atrial fibrillation(AF) commonly occurs in patients with pacemaker. We investigated whether the patients with certain clinical and electrophysiological parameters, or serological markers are more vulnerable to the occurrence of AF with long-term pacing. Methods and Results 76 patients(M:F=27:49, 67.6±14.3years old, 28 sinus node dysfunction(SND), 48 complete AV block(AVB)) without a previous history of AF who were implanted pacemaker were included, and divided according to the maximum durations of recorded atrial high rate episodes(AHRE): no AHRE, transient AF(2minutes to 24hours), paroxysmal AF(PAF;24hours to 1week), and persistent AF(PeAF;>1week). Echocardiographic findings, medications, proportions of pacing, and serologic markers related matrix remodeling, fibrosis, and chemotaxis(Matrix metalloproteinase(MMP)-9, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase(TIMP)-1, transforming growth factor(TGF)-β, pro-atrial natriuretic peptide(ANP), stromal cell derived factor(SDF)-1α), were compared. The serum was taken at the time of pacemaker follow up clinic. Results 1.During 56.4±47.5 months of follow up, 7 patients(9.2%) developed new onset AF(5 PAF and 2 PeAF) and transient AF were documented in 22.4%(17/76) of the patients. 2.The patients with newly developed clinical AF showed higher proportion of SND(71.4% vs.33.3%, p<0.05), higher prescription rate of anti-arrhythmic drugs(57.1±53.5% vs.11.6±32.3%, p<0.001), smaller left ventricular diastolic dimensions(47.2±8.3mm vs.51.6±5.1mm, p<0.05), and higher serum level of pro-ANP(7.60±2.63nmol/L vs.3.88±2.43nmol/L, p<0.001) than those without it. 3.The patients with transient AF had higher proportion of atrial pacing(52.5±28.7% vs.37.5±31.8%, p<0.05) and lower level of SDF-1α(2.65±0.53ng/mL vs.3.30±1.03ng/mL, p<0.01) compared with those without AHRE. Conclusion New onset AF was more commonly developed in patients with SND, higher pro-ANP or lower SDF-1α level after pacemaker implantation, despite of higher incidence of atrial pacing and taking antiarrhtyhmic drugs. Atrial pressure or volume overload and/or electrical heterogeneity due to long term pacing may contribute the development of AF in patients with pacemaker.


[ư]


logo 학술대회일정 사전등록안내 초록등록안내 초록등록/관리 숙박 및 교통 안내 전시안내