학술대회 안내 사전등록 안내 초록등록 안내 초록등록/관리 숙박및교통 안내


мȸ ǥ ʷ

ǥ : ȣ - 490695   227 
Differential Effect of Intra-coronary Infusion of the Mobilized Peripheral Blood Stem Cell by G-CSF on Angiomyogenesis in Patients with AMI versus OMI: Interim Result of ‘MAGIC cell-DES’ Trial
서울대학교 의과대학 내과학 교실
이해영, 강현재, 장성아, 정진욱, 김형관, 김용석, 한주용, 구본권, 김효수, 손대원, 오병희, 박영배, 최윤식
Background: The efficacy of intracoronary infusion of the mobilized peripheral blood stem cell with G-CSF has not been compared between patients with AMI versus OMI. And the possible association between neointimal hyperplasia and G-CSF-based stem cell therapy also has not been tested in the situation of drug eluting stent (DES).
Methods: We randomly allocated 112 patients with MI who had undergone coronary revascularization with DES implantation for the culprit lesion into four groups. Until now 55 patients completed 6m F/U; AMI-cell infusion (n=19), AMI-control (n=10), OMI-cell infusion (n=13), and OMI-control group (n=13). In cell infusion groups, PBSCs were mobilized by G-CSF for 3 days and selectively delivered to infarcted myocardium by trans-radial approach and over-the-wire balloon catheter.
Results:
At 6month F/U of MRI, cell infusion in AMI significantly increased LVEF (from 49.8% [SD 10.1] to 56.6% [9.7], p < 0.01) and decreased LVESV (-6.1mL [18.7], p < 0.01), compared with the control AMI patients (from 52.3% [12.7] to 54.7% [14.6], +2.6mL [24.4]). Furthermore, cell infusion significantly improved perfusion score measured by SPECT and coronary flow reserve (CFR) compared with the control AMI (from 1.6 [0.6] to 2.6 [0.7] vs 1.7 [0.4] to 2.3 [0.6], p < 0.01).
In OMI, however, cell infusion did not change LVEF (from 48.0% [SD 13.0] to 48.7% [11.9], p = 0.82) or LVESV (-0.7mL [15.3], p =0.57) compared to control OMI patients (from 44.9% [11.5] to 44.6% [12.8], +0.9mL [17.2]). It also did not improve the perfusion or CFR of infarcted myocardium in OMI (from 2.1 [0.7] to 2.8 [0.9] vs 2.0 [0.8] to 2.1 [0.8], p =0.41).
G-CSF-based cell therapy did not aggravate the neointimal growth at DES (0.23 vs 0.25, p = 0.22).
Conclusion: Interim analysis of MAGIC cell-DES trial showed that intracoronary infusion of the mobilized PBSC with G-CSF improved contractility and perfusion of infarcted myocardium more in patients with AMI than in those with OMI, which should be confirmed in the final analysis of this trial. DES is a good modality for revascularization of patients who undergo cytokine-based stem cell therapy.


[ư]